Thursday, 18 February 2010

Leviathan - Scott Westerfeld

Reading steam punk reminds me how exciting it feels to tear through a book where dramatic things are always happenings. At the moment I feel wary around adult fiction that promises big adventures, because I keep picking up novels where the adventure just isn’t that exciting, or the battle scenes rock, but the characters are unbearably pretentious.

‘Leviathan’ by Scott Westerfeld, showed once again that young adult novels can handle adventure narratives well and that creating an explosive battle scene is an endeavour of craft.

‘Leviathan’ begins in 1914, just after Archduke Ferdinand and his wife are murdered. Their deaths are the catalyst for the First World War, but in Westerfeld’s version of events their deaths also affect their young son Alek, who must flee from powerful, political enemies. In his family’s Stormwalker (a small war craft that walks on two legs) Alek and his two tutors journey to the neutrality of Switzerland. They are never at ease and must constantly fight for their lives.

In London, Deryn Sharp attempts to enter the Air Service, dressed as a boy. This is a steam punk novel so the British Air Service is a little different, the air craft are live pre-fabricated creatures, manmade whales and jellyfish, which need hydrogen to keep them afloat. The creatures were originally produced by Darwin and only Monkey-Luddites and I’m sure you can get a sense of how others view them from that slang phrase, object to these beasts being used for the good of the British Empire. Deryn’s first flight test is to board a Huxley, which is like a large, nervous jellyfish, but with happy memories of flying with her dad she’s sure she has the natural ability the Air Service values. An unexpected storm sweeps her off course and she is found by the ‘Leviathan’ airship and taken aboard as a midshipman. The crew of the ‘Leviathan’ will eventually come into contact with Alek and the two characters become wary allies, then friends as shared experiences allow them to bond.

Westerfeld’s steam punk world is exactly what I hoped to explore when I came up with the idea of reading steam punk for a month. It seems I prefer steam punk societies where the new technology is an active part of the story and technology plays a significant part in ‘Leviathan’. A political divide is drawn between form Clanker powers (countries that favour machinery) and Darwinist civilisations (countries that advocate using pre-fabs). Just as religion created many real political alliances throughout history, technology determines which countries fight against each other in ‘Leviathan’. The two different forms of technology also become homes to the main characters, as Deryn and Alek live in their war ships and this allows the author to explore the mechanical logic that makes the technology work in detail. Having the characters live in the technology, provides a way to make technology personal and important, in the same way that setting your character’s lives on a ship can make the way a ship works more interesting. There’s plenty of imaginative technological detail to enjoy, like bats that excrete metal and the differences between classes of Clanker warships, but the way the technology works is explained simply for younger readers so even technophobes like me can understand how the pieces fit together.

As ‘Leviathan’ is written for younger readers (the book jacket recommends from 10 years old and up) the sentences were compact and the paragraphs were often exceptionally short, which I guess is designed to hold the attention of younger children. The fact that I didn’t feel anything lacking because of the writing’s compact style opened my mind to reading more of what Americans call middle grade fiction, which I’ve always assumed is a bit too simplistic to satisfy adult readers (I know, I know, I am converted now, sorry about that). The style was actually better suited to battle scenes and adventure episodes than the longer sentences similar adult fiction often uses. Books full of action should be purposeful, with tight description, so the simpler style of writing for younger readers really fits with extremely active narratives. The writing in ‘Leviathan’ reminded me of some of my favourite action/adventure novels from my childhood, which were fun and always felt like they made every word count , like Tamora Pierce’s ‘The Song of the Lioness’ series,. The freshness of the writing and the ease with which Westerfeld relates the excitement in a scene is invigorating and it makes me question why other writers weigh down their action scenes.

The only part of the book I disliked was the love story, which emerged at the end of the book. I have a multitude of feelings about this one small plot point and most of them are irrational. It’s irrational for me to hold the fact that Deryn contemplates giving up everything to protect Alek’s secret against ‘Leviathan’ but I do. By establishing such a strong friendship between Deryn and Alek, Westerfeld has set up valid textual reasons why Deryn would risk everything to protect Alek’s secret, but part of me sees Deryn falling in love with Alek, only to be transformed from a spunky, brave character into a plucky girl, whose bravery now comes from sacrificing what she wants for the good of others. It’s a little matter as Deryn realises her feelings for Alek at the end of the novel, but my mind just goes to these kind of things when I read. It’s irrelevant to say I think their friendship doesn’t need to become a love story (well it does, deal with the book at hand not the book you wish existed), but I don’t think it does and there it is. I’ll probably get over it.

That’s my review then. Now I’ll just go and wait patiently for the second book to be released (oh only later this year, well that’s much better than 2011). ‘The Leviathan’ will arrive in the Ottoman Empire and we’ll all find out what is in the eggs the ship is carrying. Can’t wait!

Other Reviews

Villa Negativa
GuysLitWire
Necromancy Never Pays
The Zen Leaf

16 comments:

Jeanne said...

The waiting to find out what's in the eggs is killing me, just KILLING me! I was very cross in my review that the book left me in such a state.

Amanda said...

I love this book and I didn't mind the ending. If I never found out anything more, I'd be okay.

Just curious - do you think it's brave and strong of the girl to give up her secret for someone she loves (either romantically or as a friend)? I'm not saying I disagree with you, but I do wonder if maybe it's not just as strong (if not stronger) to sacrifice oneself for another person. Whether the person sacrificing is male or female.

Lenore said...

I've been kind of apprehensive about starting this. Gotta take the plunge!

Trapunto said...

Great, thorough review. The bats are one of my favorite parts and I never thought to mention them. I believe the compact style comes naturally to Westerfeld, which is why it works in Leviathan.

Do you think Darwin's granddaughter is going to turn out to be a shady character, or a noble one? I am almost thinking she is going to be revealed as a bad guy or spy in the next book. Partly because of the way she's portrayed in the illustrations.

Jodie said...

Jeanne what is it?! I can't even think, but my best guess is some kind of mythical beast crossbreed, possibly with machine bits in it.

Amanda I think it depends on the circumstances, but yes there are times when it is brave and strong to give up something for someone you love. You won't hear me moaning about all other tragic yet somehow positive endings that involve people helping others out to their own detriment.

Unfortunately it does seem like it's always the girl who has to give up her dreams in fiction, not that men don't give up things but they tend to make different kinds of sacrafices. I think generally a female character will give up soemthing she really wants that doesn't really affect the man she's giving it up for, like her career prospects, while male characters tend to sacrafice something that affects both him and the woman he gives it up for, like giving up their relationship to ensure her future happiness. Sure she'll be happy later, but in the present she hurts just as much as he does.

Also men tend to have alternative options after they make their sacrafice, while women cut off all of their chances, at least in historical and alternative history novels, as well as a lot of sci-fi. It's not that I mind people sacraficing something for those they love (although in some other novels I've read authors make them give up things and it's just unnecessary, a bit of calm talking could sort it all out ;) ) it's that I think the general balance between what's at stake and how often they're asked to throw everything away is different for men and women.

Like everything else it all sees to come back to diversity of fictional representation. There aren't enough examples of men sacraficing careers, futures, inheritance etc for love for me to be comfortable seeing a woman doing so (or at least I haven't come across enough examples).

On a sort of unrelated note one of my biggest problems with the way Deryn reacts to being asked to choose between Alek and her duty is that her first thought is along the lines of 'it's ok if they find out I lied I'll just have to give up everything to save my neck' rather than 'well I'd better try to be really good at hiding what I'm doing'. Maybe that reflects her honest nature? Meh, I'm not sold on that point, she's pretty resourceful and she has no trouble bending the spirit of other rules what with her disguise and all. To me it seemed like all her good sense had been banished to show how deeply she feels for Alek.

Lenore go for it, it will be fine :)

Jodie said...

Trapunto great question! I think she's going to be heroic, but rebel against Empire policies and so be frowned upon by the men, especially the captain (who seems pretty shady to me). Although I know all the boffins wear bowler hats a woman with that kind of hat automatically makes me think she is if not shifty, then up to something the mainstream won't like.

Eva said...

The whole Steampunk thing seems interesting to me, but I'd rather explore it in a book aimed at adults!

Doret said...

I want to know what is in the eggs too. I have no clue.

I always wonder why, when teen girls pretend they are boys in fiction, they hardly ever deal with getting their period.

I love the illus.

One of my co-workers loved an adult steampunk novel called Boneshaker by Priest. Westerfield blurbed it.

Jodie said...

Eva I second Doret's suggestion for 'Boneshaker'. I'm reading it now and it alternates between following a youngish mother (thirties) and her teenage son. It's more sombre and kind of dystopian. Or if you want something more fun I suggest the Kage Barker book I read earlier this month, 'The Women of Nell Gwynne's'.

Doret I think I've seen girls dressed as boys hiding their periods in a couple of pirate books, definately in 'The Pirate Queen': http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/n/diana-norman/pirate-queen.htm which is a fab book.

Heather said...

I have had this one since it came out and haven't read it yet! I must remedy that situation. Great review Jodie, I'm going to move it up on the pile. I just love Westerfeld.

Amanda said...

I know what you mean. Like I said, I wasn't really disagreeing with you - you're right, the girl always seems to be the one to make the sacrifice. I guess I was just in the mood for debate when I wrote that comment. :D

Jodie said...

Yay Heather I want everyone to read it :)

Amanda I like debate too and it let me really work through what I was thinking so thanks for the help :)

Peta said...

Sounds fab! I'm so, so, so tempted to sneakily buy this one but I'm not sure I could handle the guilt as my TBR pile is a disgrace...

Litlove said...

This makes me think of the Philip Reeve, to the extent that he could really do drama, without compromising depth on the significance of his events in any way. Is it really only YA and fantasy that can do that these days? It sort of looks that way. Great review, Jodie, and another book that I would never have picked up before reading your post on it.

Jodie said...

Oh go on Peta if it's that bad why not make it worse ;)

litlove I'm not going to get to the Reeve this month, but I do wonder how many similarities I will see between them when I get to 'Mortal Engines'. I really hope it's not just YA and fantasy that can do so successfully, but after searching for recommendations from other genre I realised almost everything I could think of had a fantasy variation. I would say Conn Igullden is very good at pulling off fantastic action sequences in his historical series about Julius Caesar and Brutus. At the same time he shows the progression of the relationship between the two men. Worth a go if you like historical fiction (and can forgive rather too many battles in the third book).

Trapunto said...

You're so right about the bowler hat. I was thinking mostly of the knowing, femme fatale eyes.