Thursday, 13 October 2011

Moving Day

Hello everyone, just a note to say that I’m moving blog homes. Blogger was a good sturdy setting for me and my words for two years, in fact I never thought I’d leave, what with it being such a simple content publishing system for someone with low technical knowledge. There are a few different reasons why I’ve decided to move, but essentially a more attractive service presented itself and I’m off to Dreamwidth.

If anyone is thinking of moving to Dreamwidth and wants to hear about my import experience in depth, just ask, but it went well and was pretty easy for a girl with low tech skills and someone advising her. I’m not sure everything about the layout at my new place will stay the same, in fact I know some things will change once I figure out how to make technical adjustments. I haven’t worked out how to move existing comments across yet, so this blog will remain up until I sort something out there, but overall my experience has been really positive so far. There are still things I need to quit being lazy and do (write things in my profile, set up links lists, retag things, fix video code) so please excuse the mess, but with those caveats welcome to my new place,
Bookgazing version 2.

I know there are benefits to having a Dreamwidth account to comment on Dreamwidth journals (I don’t know what they are, but I know they are real) and I have a few Dreamwidth codes should anyone want one. I hope you’ll all feel happy visiting over there, whenever you want.

Wednesday, 5 October 2011

'Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children' - Ransom Riggs

When he was a child, Jacob’s eccentric Polish grandfather told him stories about monsters. While Jacob always took these stories as truth, his father later explains that the stories are just an old man’s way of coping with experiences from WWII. Jacob wrestles with his disappointment as he grows up and his grandfather appears to grow increasingly irrational, hiding in his house with his gun collection, until one day Jacob finds him bleeding to death in the woods. To everyone else it appears that he wandered confused into the path of a large bob-cat, or savage dog but Jacob’s brain thinks he saw something else in the woods that day; an otherworldly monster which gives him screaming nightmares that must be treated with therapy. As he and his therapist try to establish that he didn’t see anything so sinister, his mind continues to puzzle over his grandfather’s last words instructing him to ‘Find the bird. In the loop’.

Jacob thinks that a trip to a remote British island, which may be associated with his grandfather’s past, could finally settle his mind. Of course you, gentle reader, will be well aware that trips to mysterious islands usually create more questions than they answer and will be unsurprised when Jacob’s curious pursuit of his grandfather’s history leads him deep into science fiction land. On the island he discovers an orphanage full of peculiar children who once knew his grandfather well. Unfortunately it is probably deeply spoilerific to reveal much more about the plot (which may leave the rest of this review feeling a little vague, sorry) so let me redirect and talk about the format of Rigg’s novel, the real unique selling point of
‘Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children’.

Riggs has used vintage photographs alongside his novel’s text. Unusual black and white, or sepia images illustrate many of the things and people that Jacob encounters, contributing an old-fashioned horror aesthetic to the novel. You can see some of the photographs in this trailer for the book if you fancy watching:



The photographs show creepy oddities, often children in old fashioned dress apparently performing tricks that force the reader to look twice to confirm what they are seeing. The innate innocence of a child in a picture is subverted by the incongruous, supernatural tricks they seem to be taking part in. It’s strange and a little unnerving to see a photograph of a child in an old-fashioned setting, or dress, because picture of children are typically a reminder of youth, a symbol of eternal life and by association the constant reinvention of modernity. The inclusion of these photographs, which attach the patina of history to small children, indicates unsettling associations between children and ageing, or innocence and darkness. It’s well creepy.

In contrast, Jacob’s narrative is written in a vigorous, modern style which fills his story with dynamic action. The descriptions of with Sharp explicit description is used, which give the reader a strong mental picture of horrors and oddities that Jacob encounters:

‘I let go of my grandfather’s body and stood up, every nerve ending tingling with an instinct I didn’t know I had. There was something in the woods alright – I could feel it.

There was no moon and no movement in the underbrush but our own, and yet somehow I knew just when to raise my flashlight and just where to aim it, and for an instant in that narrow cut of light I saw a face that seemed to have been transplanted directly from the nightmares of my childhood. It stared back with eyes that swam in dark liquid, furrowed trenches of carbon-black flesh loose on its hunched frame, it’s mouth hinged open grotesquely so that a mass of long eel-like tongues could wriggle out.’

‘Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children’ contains an interesting blend of two different types of horror aesthetics. This results in a book full of dynamic action, that will suit fans of adventure novels and old style creepiness, which will appeal to readers who like the quiet fear that incongruous oddness injects into a horror story.

Riggs is the first author I’ve seen using photographic prints in young adult fiction. He gains serious originality points for deciding to combine them with the text of a full novel. Finding just the right kind of story to fit the use of real, found old style photographs shows Riggs interest in shaping stories around technique and that experimental side of his narrative makes me excited. In fact, when I think about why I enjoyed this novel I keep coming back to the format, that creative and apt use of the images. The newness of the technique is interesting and the photographs are visually striking, but they can’t carry an entire book to glory anymore than any other experimental form can.

So, what other positive elements does ‘Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children’ contain? It has a strong adventure plot, which grips and takes its characters into real situations of peril. Watching the twists unravel, spotting the villain just before the end, as the book directs the discovery and watching the climactic good vs. evil struggle play out is entertaining. Reading this novel is like reading a creepy version of a traditional ‘boys own’ adventure novel, especially with the inclusion of two significant, complicated male relationships in Jacob’s life. I’m intrigued and I want to see where the sequel takes Jacob after one satisfyingly teasing cliff-hanger.

And the world building is fantastic, although sadly it would again be a bit too spoiler to describe its specifics. The details that make up the science fiction/fantasy element of the plot are again original (despite some slightly hand wavy explanation of some of the science fiction) and fun.

Still, for me ‘Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children’ was almost a
skipping stone book. There was nothing wrong with it technically, in fact there was a lot right (well balanced pacing, appropriate match between format and story, confident voice) and I enjoyed reading it, but there were niggles. My reaction after finishing the story feels similar in tone to Ana’s reaction, although the little things that nibbled at me after finishing were different to the ones that prodded at her.

Let me try to give an example. I found parts of the character creation frustratingly rooted in a limited form of traditional story telling. Riggs has created a novel which is so full of innovation in other areas that when mildly stereotypical character creation is used it’s dull, lack of creativity is very visible in contrast to all the other distinctive content. I could also see the potential for less well covered sci-fi stories to be told, from the perspective of other characters in the novel like Jacob’s grandfather, which were passed over in favour of following Jacob’s fairly standard sci-fi story. I often felt like I would find those stories more unique than Jacob’s, even though Jacob’s story is quite exciting. Perhaps what I want are multiple spin off novels as well as a direct sequel.

Not a perfect book to capture my heart then, but still well worth spending my time going on this adventure with Jacob. Many thanks to the publisher,
Quirk for providing me with a copy for review. Hey Jeanne, Riggs is a Kenyon graduate, maybe you want to take a look at it (not that I’m a book pusher or anything).

Other Reviews

The Booksmugglers
Stainless Steel Droppings
Good Books and Good Wine
Books I Done Read
I Draw All Day and Write All Night
Bart’s Bookshelves

Sunday, 2 October 2011

'The Vesuvius Club' - Mark Gatiss

It’s no surprise to me that Gatiss, who worked on the recent reboots of two beloved sources of British entertainment (‘Dr Who’ and ‘Sherlock’), has playfully plaited elements of classic crime novels and British male heroes into his novel. Lucifer Box, the protagonist of ‘The Vesuvius Club’, is a distinct character from classic British crime stopping heroes like Bond and Holmes, as his story is set in the Edwardian era, he’s a bit dandyish and he keeps his work secret from those around him. Still, his character betrays strong links to these classic heroes.

As Lucifer Box the most scandalous and the eligible bachelor in Edwardian society he paints (the equivalent of Holmes cultured love of the violin). He has little patience of empathy for those around him (Holmes). He always knows where to find a quiet spot for the uninterrupted satisfaction of any willing lady (Bond, of course).

As Lucifer Box, agent for The British Secret Service, Box is efficient with a pistol (Bond) and has an almost sociopath enthusiasm for the ruthless pursuit of wrongdoers (Holmes). These features of his character make him a fantastic asset for the crown, even if his incautious nature has led to some problems in the past (Holmes, Bond, every secret agent ever).

It’s not just Box’s personality that is reminiscent of classic British novels about solving crimes and serving your country. ‘The Vesuvius Club’ also contains little textual flourishes that allude to the Bond and Holmes narratives. The names of the characters are sometimes deliciously over the top. If you thought the suggestive names of ‘Holmes’ villains like Lord Blackwood and Lord Coward were a bit over the top even for a pastiche, grab something and squeeze hard. Box meets people called Cretaceous Unmann and Charlie Jackpot, whose names become extremely suggestive after the reader learns a little about the characters. This kind of comic naming can be tiring, if not embarrassing, in pastiche novels, or even in classic sources. Fleming’s tendency to name his female characters suggestively is best ignored, for instance, but the game of names in ‘The Vesuvius Club’ remains fresh because the joke that is presented to the reader is constantly varied. Some characters are named suggestively, while some names present mild intellectual games that ask the reader to ferret out the connection to a cultural reference. One man is called Professor Verdigris...a posher version of Professor Green from Cludeo maybe? A Mrs Midsomer Knight appears. For variation, some characters have perfectly ordinary names, like Tom Bowler and Delilah, that don’t gesture to a part of their character or an in joke.

So, like many contemporary novels with historical settings ‘The Vesuvius Club’ includes a certain amount of pastiche, which forges connections between the novel and the literary traditions established by older sources. The fondly mocking attempt at imitation engages the reader in the fun of recognising what is being mimicked by the naming conventions and the chapter titles like ‘The Man in the Indigo Spectacles’. The witty voice of Box sounds a bit like Wilde, or The Scarlet Pimpernel, which again creates more narrative connections for the reader to delight in. Even the fast, fun adventure narrative which poses no real threat to Box’s safety (although the reader may feel he is in danger while in the thick of the action) is a kind of reproduction of earlier entertainment styles like Bond narratives and musketeer movies. No hero dies today. The connection between these particular areas and the familiar novelistic conventions of other exciting sources provides a certain element of cosy fun; aha moments of recognition are available to all kinds of readers.

Unfortunately ‘The Vesuvius Club’ extends its reflection of narrative tradition into a reproduction of old, representational stereotypes. As part of his search to unravel the novel’s central mystery Box meets a Chinese man; a Chinese man called Mr Lee who reportedly runs an opium den. Mr Lee speaks to Box in incomplete English phrases like ‘ ‘Why you come like this? We all friends here. You want pipe?’ ’. I’m sure that given his stereotypical name Mr Lee could be considered just part of the pastiche element of this novel, but to me it seems that his character has been plucked right out of the chest marked ‘lazy historical stereotypes’. His characterisation can’t even be explained by the usual cry of ‘contextually realistic views’ because the narrative doesn’t just make Box bark out his own prejudiced views, it actually makes Lee really represent the stereotype.

It gets...not worse, just differently stereotypical. Mr Lee is actually not the rather stupid, weak man he appears to be. He is cunningly disguising himself, until an opportunity to overpower Box appears. Aha, aha I thought, subversion is coming surely. He will turn out to be a criminal mastermind! Lee indeed reveals himself to be a violent, much stronger criminal, but he also turns out to be a villain who is involved in drugging people and carting their bodies away. In this second Mr Lee, there’s a manifestation of a historical white Western fear that Chinese people would drug white women and sell them into slavery. He may, or may not still be the owner of an opium den, as it isn’t clarified whether this was a pose as part of his disguise, so we get the narrative possibility that Mr Lee continues to conform to that pervasive, unjustified stereotype of the seedy Chinese opium seller.

This easy acceptance of racial stereotypes is disappointing, because ‘The Vesuvius Club’ spends time subverting other areas of the dominant cultural narrative. It is totally #teamboyskissing. A ‘secret’ that prevents Box from breaking ties with his British Secret Service employer Joshua Reynolds; yes that
Joshua Reynolds is hinted at early on. If, like me, you were told that Box is a gay spy you will be confused by the fact that Lucifer’s secret does not seem to be his sexuality, as he makes eyes at a lady called Bella Pok for a significant portion of the book. Then, bam, there we go, a character called Charlie Jackpot arrives and Lucifer’s secret is revealed; he’s bisexual. The few sentences of social commentary that follow this revelation make it clear that the narrative has been designed to deliberately conceal the protagonist’s sexuality, so that later a surprise can be sprung.

‘You are shocked are you not? Or perhaps reading this in some distant and unimaginably utopian future like that funny little man Mr Wells would have us believe in, you are not shocked at all!’

‘The Vesuvius Club’ intends to confront reader expectations about what kind of men can be secret agents. The protagonist is a bisexual male spy. He is both an incredibly fastidious dresser and a violent sociopath who will happily shoot someone in the head (a ruthlessness which is framed as a good quality, as it is in many secret agent narratives). He swirls stereotypical expectations around and makes popularly perceived norms about gender and sexuality all messy.

At the same time the novel thoughtlessly embraces certain racial stereotypes in the way it presents Mr Lee. And late on a strange approach to transgender people shows up, tottering down the line between ‘contextually relevant opinions, which are frowned upon in modern liberal society’ and ‘modern casual privilege’. There are places where the novel contributes something new to the mainstream narrative (its villain is a transgender mad scientist, which is not exactly a common character type), but these new elements are limited in the way they subvert narrative common places. Putting a transgender scientist villain into a novel confronts reader expectation that an action adventure narrative must always be a straight, male affair. However, if the narrative allows its protagonist to (however contextually relevantly) dismiss a transgender character’s choice, it is still allowing that certain areas of the negative dominant cultural narrative do not need to be destabilized.

It’s a shame that ‘The Vesuvius Club’ contains this negative cultural reinforcement, because it’s also a full on fun, frantic, inventive novel, which features energetic coach chases through cemeteries, sci-fi style volcano bombs, sudden shootings and visits to decadent brothels. A sexy, sometimes tender new relationship springs up between Lucifer and Charlie, resulting in moments like this:

‘ “This is meant to be my day off,” said Charlie. “Who do I talk to about overtime?”

I looked him directly in the eye and managed a smile. “Charlie, what can I say?”

He stroked my hair with uncommon gentleness. “All part of the service.” '

despite Lucifer’s best efforts to keep Charlie a detached fuck buddy. The fact that Gatiss has built a novel around a bisexual spy protagonist is marvellous. However, the problem of the novels reliance on stereotypes remains. ‘The Vesuvius Club’ is the novel with a self centred, crime solving, bisexual spy making out with a friendly, sexy, kickass gay male side kick. It is also the novel where a transsexual character is insulted by Box for being transsexual and has no space to reply to that (oh and of course that character dies, along with Mr Lee). As Sarah Rees Brennan says in her excellent essay
‘All Those Who Default From the Default Will Be Punished (But Personally I think They Will be Awesome)’, ‘it’s much easier to criticise something that’s present than to criticise the absence of something’. It’s important to remember when critiquing novels which subvert some cultural norms, but still display their own set of cultural problems, that there are billions of books out there which avoid such cultural criticism because they conform so fully to prevailing narratives. Still, it’s hard not to be disappointed at the limitations of this particular novel.